By Madeline Roquemore

 

Introduction

 

The concept of composting varies widely across Canada in familiarity, access, legal frameworks, and environmental impact. Given this variability, it is helpful to begin with a clear understanding of composting as a biological process in which microorganisms use oxygen to convert organic waste into a stable, nutrient-rich material [1]. Composting plays a key role in diverting waste from landfills at both household and industrial scales, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving soil fertility, and cycling nutrients back into food systems [2].

 

Effective composting system design is key to realizing these benefits. When organic waste ends up in landfills, it decomposes anaerobically due to the absence of oxygen and produces methane. Methane emissions from decomposing organic waste are a major environmental concern, as methane has a global warming potential approximately 28 times greater than carbon dioxide over a 100-year period [2]. The International Energy Agency (2025) estimates that methane has contributed to about 30% of global warming since the industrial era, though actual emissions are likely underreported due to data limitations [3]. In Canada, municipal landfills are the third-largest source of methane emissions, contributing 28% of the country’s methane output in 2020 [4]. Composting offers a proactive solution to reduce these emissions by diverting organic materials from landfill sites and preventing the conditions under which methane is formed.

 

Some municipalities have implemented landfill gas (LFG) capture systems and soil covers to reduce methane emissions from existing landfills. LFG capture systems use a network of wells and pipes to collect methane gas generated by decomposing waste, while soil covers help contain and reduce gas escape. In Canada, these systems collectively capture about 33% of the methane produced in landfills, with much of the recovered gas renewed to be used for energy generation [5]. However, economic and logistical challenges often limit the utilization of recovered gas for energy production [6]. While these technologies lessen methane emissions from existing waste, composting offers a more proactive strategy in preventing methane formation at the source. As cities seek to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the waste sector, composting provides a circular and climate-aligned solution.

 

This is particularly urgent given the persistent challenge of managing organic waste in Canada. Municipal responses to this vary significantly. While cities like Halifax, Toronto, and Vancouver have developed established organics diversion systems, other communities face barriers such as limited infrastructure, inadequate funding, low public participation, and a lack of technical expertise. Regional factors such as climate, agricultural practices, and local policy frameworks also influence composting outcomes. Additional complexities include transportation emissions, home composting access, and quality standards for finished compost, especially where compost is sold and applied to land, requiring suitable processing and regular monitoring.

Beyond the local scale, composting aligns with Canada’s national and international climate commitments. Under the Paris Agreement and the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act, Canada aims to reduce emissions by 40-45% from 2005 levels by 2030 and reach net-zero by 2050. The 2030 Emissions Reduction Plan targets methane reductions from the waste sector, highlighting composting as a priority strategy, particularly since Canada joined the Global Methane Pledge in 2021 [7]. These targets highlight the importance of transforming waste systems into climate solutions.

 

Composting is also central to broader efforts to transition toward a circular economy, which prioritizes reducing waste and regenerating ecosystems. Compost fits naturally into this model by cycling nutrients, restoring soil health, and supporting food systems [8]. These intersecting environmental, policy, and health objectives position composting as essential to sustainable community development.

 

To explore how composting can meet these challenges and goals, this paper evaluates composting systems across Canadian municipalities, with attention to local innovations, regional disparities, and federal frameworks. The goal is to identify what is working, where barriers persist, and how composting can serve as a scalable solution for climate mitigation and sustainable development.

 

Roles and Responsibilities

 

In order to have a clear understanding of Canada’s composting landscape, it is important to understand the roles and responsibilities across federal, provincial, and municipal levels.
 

Waste management is a shared responsibility:

 

• Municipal governments are in charge of day-to-day waste operations, including collection, composting, recycling, and disposal. They frequently partner with private firms to deliver these services.

 

• Provinces and territories set policies, approve facility operations, and enforce compliance with environmental regulations.

 

• The federal government oversees cross-border waste movement, provides funding, sets national emissions targets, and supports research and strategies to reduce waste sector emissions.

 

• The Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME), also worth mentioning, unites environmental ministers from all levels to coordinate waste management policies nationwide [9].

 

Key Tools Supporting Organics Management

 

The Canadian government has developed several technical and planning resources to support composting and organic waste management. While gaps remain in planning and reporting, these tools provide essential guidance that helps advance progress.

 

Technical Document on Municipal Solid Waste Organics Processing: This document is produced by Environment and Climate Change Canada, and it compiles lessons from North America covering composting, anaerobic digestion, biogas recovery, and emissions control. It offers technical guidance on system design, procurement, and compost quality standards to help municipalities reduce greenhouse gases and manage organic waste within integrated systems [10].

 

Greenhouse Gas Calculator Tool: This Excel-based tool is available through Environment and Climate Change Canada and lets municipalities, developers, and the public estimate emissions from various waste management methods. It models mixed solid waste, source-separated organics, and single-stream materials, and it creates a comparison between baseline and alternative scenarios, using inputs such as location, transport distances, and landfill gas recovery. This helps to identify how shifting from landfilling to composting reduces GHG emissions [11].

 

Solid Waste Management for Northern and Remote Communities: Planning and Technical Guidance Document: This guide was created with territorial governments and experts, and it addresses the unique challenges northern, Indigenous, and remote communities face in waste management. It offers recommendations for design, operation, and closure of municipal solid waste facilities in these regions [12].

 

Provincial Composting Policies and Support Programs

 

Provinces publish regulations and frameworks guiding composting facility operations, each reflecting local priorities and challenges. A snapshot includes:

 

• British Columbia: Under CleanBC, British Columbia aims to keep 95% of residential food and yard waste out of the landfills by 2030. The province is continuing to implement organics bans and fund composting and collection infrastructure through programs launched in 2020 and updated in the following years [13, 14].

 

• Alberta: Alberta regulates non-agricultural compost facilities under the Code of Practice for Compost Facilities [15]. In March 2025, Bill 44 amended the Agricultural Operations Practice Act to expand organic materials allowed for biogas production, supporting waste reduction. Biogas is a renewable gas produced in processing when bacteria break down organic waste without oxygen, also creating nutrient-rich soil amendments [16,17].
   

• Saskatchewan: Saskatchewan introduced the Compost Facility Chapter in 2025 to ease administrative burdens for smaller composting facilities and to encourage wider adoption of composting overall. SaskBuilds and Procurement Program launched a 2024 waste diversion program to expand recycling and composting in government buildings [18,19].

 

• Manitoba: The Manitoba Compost Support Payment program offers financial incentives to composting facilities that divert organic waste, supporting emissions reductions. The Waste Reduction and Prevention Act authorizes the ECCC to designate which materials have waste potential and to develop regulatory waste reduction requirements according to their designations [20, 21].

 

• Ontario: The Food and Organic Waste Framework guides compost policies, and Ontario’s Compost Quality Standards and the Guideline for Production of Compost provide guidelines to ensure safe composting that protects both public health and the environment [22].
   

• Quebec: The Residual Materials Management Policy aims to build a green economy by reducing landfill waste through increased resource recovery and energy production. It includes five-year action plans (such as the 2019-2024 plan that has over $100 million in funding) focused on preventing waste, supporting climate goals, and promoting accountability among waste management players [23].

 

• New Brunswick: New Brunswick promotes composting through curbside programs and home/community composting. Its Strategic Action Plan for Solid Waste Management (2023–2030) targets waste reduction, organics infrastructure, and education [24].

 

• Nova Scotia: Nova Scotia bans organic waste from landfills and offers curbside green cart collection to a large majority of households. The province supports large-scale composting infrastructure and diversion targets [25].
   

• Prince Edward Island: Prince Edward Island mandates source separation of organics through Waste Watch. This promotes centralized composting of residential and agricultural waste [26].

 

• Newfoundland and Labrador: Newfoundland and Labrador is guided by its Waste Management Strategy which aims for 50% solid waste diversion by 2025. The Multi-Materials Stewardship Board supports education, funding, and compost bin distribution [27].

 

These provincial policies, though varied, collectively support Canada’s national goals for waste reduction and climate mitigation.

 

Acknowledging Indigenous and Northern Communities

 

Indigenous and northern communities in Canada require distinct composting and waste management approaches, shaped by geography, culture, and infrastructure. These communities are often faced with logistical barriers due to remote locations, limited transportation access, and harsher climate conditions that affect waste processing. For example, permafrost and short construction seasons complicate siting and operating composting facilities in northern areas. At the same time, traditional land stewardship values and knowledge systems, including holistic views of resource cycles and intergenerational responsibility, offer sustainable organic waste practices that align with local ecosystems and cultures [28].

 

Collaborative efforts with Indigenous leadership, culturally appropriate guidance, and long-term funding are essential for effective, community-driven composting solutions. The Indigenous Leadership Fund, supported federally, aims to co-develop climate resilience strategies with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis partners, recognizing Indigenous rights and sovereignty in environmental governance [29]. The Indigenous Climate Leadership initiatives also work with Indigenous communities on climate strategies [28]. Additionally, the Planning and Technical Guidance for Northern and Remote Communities offers specialized resources adapted to unique northern contexts [12]. Prioritizing Indigenous voices and sovereignty in waste policies is essential for equitable, environmentally sound composting systems nationwide.

 

Municipal and Advocacy Bodies

 

Alongside Indigenous and northern initiatives, municipal and advocacy organizations play a large role in advancing composting across Canada. The Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) represents municipal governments covering about 92% of the population. FCM speaks out for municipalities in federal policies and programs, providing resources like waste management toolkits and connecting them to funding [30].

 

The Compost Council of Canada, a non-profit, also supports municipalities with training, certification programs, conferences, and advocacy on compost quality and market development. It promotes best practices and research linking compost to agriculture, erosion control, and carbon sequestration [31].

 

Benchmarking, Data Collection, and Gaps

 

While numerous programs and resources exist to promote composting, effective measurement and reporting are crucial to assess composting and waste diversion efforts. However, underreporting and inconsistent data collection limit opportunities for improvement. To address this, several benchmarking and data tools have been created to help municipalities track and improve climate action.

 

The National Solid Waste Benchmarking Initiative (NSWBI), established in 2011, allows municipalities to evaluate cost-effectiveness, environmental performance, and operational models of solid waste programs, including organics diversion. It enables comparisons and identifies performance gaps [32].

 

The National Climate League (NCL) report, run by Climate Reality Project Canada, is a volunteer-driven data project tracking municipal climate plans and policies annually, providing insights for inter-municipal learning [33].

 

Despite these tools, disparities exist in meeting national climate and waste targets. Large cities like Toronto, Calgary, and Vancouver meet over 75% of indicators, while smaller municipalities fall behind [34]. Common challenges include limited staff, funding, and a lack of formal plans or consistent reporting metrics.

 

Case Studies

 

Canada’s municipalities have diverse composting strategies, from large urban systems to small communities and Indigenous-led initiatives. The following analysis evaluates infrastructure, policies, engagement, scalability, and operational challenges.

 

Halifax

 

Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) was an early leader in composting, launching curbside organics collection in January 1999, following Nova Scotia’s 1998 landfill ban on organic waste. The program reached about 95,000 single-family homes, achieving over 90% participation and diverting 36,000 tonnes of organic waste in its first year. HRM supported this with ongoing education, including door-to-door outreach, mall displays, and TV campaigns. These efforts maintained strong participation rates [35].

 

This organic waste diversion allowed HRM to close its only raw waste landfill. The solution of composting and waste stabilization cuts methane emissions by roughly 1.4 tonnes of carbon dioxide per resident annually. Economically, the program avoided tax increases and created 125 permanent jobs. This new culture of waste separation was embedded into society by strong public buy-in and voluntary business participation [35].

 

By 2024, HRM processed over 50,000 tonnes of organic waste yearly. However, the Halifax Index 2025 reports residential waste diversion fell to 52%, down from an average 59% over the previous decade, likely due to population growth and changing waste streams [36].

 

In response to changing pressures, HRM opened a new enclosed composting facility at Ragged Lake in 2024. With a 60,000-tonne capacity, it features negative pressure airflow, multi-stage biofilters, and closed-loop leachate treatment, making it water negative [37].

 

Despite recent challenges, Halifax’s long-term infrastructure and policies make it a model for organics management and provide a reminder for evolving improvement and efforts.

 

Montreal

 

Montreal has recently become a focal point in urban organics management with the opening of its new composting facility in Saint-Laurent. Launched in late 2024, this enclosed, indoor LEED Gold-certified facility processes up to 50,000 tonnes of organic waste annually using closed-tunnel composting technology. This method confines organic material in sealed tunnels and maintains negative pressure throughout the facility, effectively controlling odours and airborne emissions [38]. Previously, Montreal’s organic waste travelled approximately 180 kilometers to be processed in Ontario. The new plant reduces this distance to an average of 6 kilometers, substantially lowering transportation-related emissions. The resulting compost is made available to residents and sold to local farmers [39]. The facility includes air quality monitoring, an onsite weather station, and glass-enclosed public viewing areas to support education. Through school group tours and public exhibits, the facility aims to foster long-term behavioural change in waste management.

 

Despite approximately 87% of Montreal residences having access to curbside organic collection as of 2024, participation varies significantly from about 60% in small buildings and only 30% in larger multi-unit residences [40]. To address this gap and encourage sustainable habits, Montreal has expanded community engagement initiatives. The city-run Zero Waste Squad outreach program has engaged over 13,000 residents through starter kits, door-to-door conversations, and public workshops [41]. While challenges with participation and contamination remain, the Saint-Laurent facility, combined with these community efforts, marks a significant infrastructural and cultural milestone in urban waste management. Montreal’s approach positions the city as a national model for the transition toward a zero-waste future.

 

Vancouver

 

Metro Vancouver operates one of Canada’s most coordinated and successful municipal composting programs. In 2023, the region diverted more than 400,000 tonnes of food scraps from landfill, preventing approximately 160,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions and generating 140,000 tonnes of finished compost [42]. The region also maintains one of the highest waste diversion rates in North America at approximately 65%, as noted by Metro Vancouver officials [43].

 

This high diversion rate is supported by a layered policy framework that integrates provincial regulation, regional coordination, and municipal implementation. At the provincial level, the Organic Matter Recycling Regulation (OMRR) sets environmental and operational standards for composting facilities, and the CleanBC Organic Infrastructure and Collection Program (OICP) provides funding to support composting infrastructure [44, 45].

 

At the regional level, Metro Vancouver coordinates solid waste policy across 21 municipalities, including a region-wide organics disposal ban implemented in 2015 and waste reduction targets outlined in its Solid Waste Management Plan. This coordination enables consistent service delivery and public messaging  [46].

 

At the municipal level, the City of Vancouver offers weekly green bin collection, biweekly garbage pickup, and numerous education initiatives. Programs like the Zero Waste Schools Program, community workshops, and multilingual outreach campaigns promote high compliance and community engagement [47]. Vancouver’s integrated approach to policy, infrastructure, and education offers a scalable model for municipalities aiming to build robust, science-informed composting systems.

 

Toronto

 

Toronto’s Green Bin program has evolved into a multifaceted organics management system integrating anaerobic digestion (AD), renewable energy recovery, and a suite of supportive policy frameworks. In recent years, the city has collected approximately 170,000 tonnes of organic material annually. Toronto processes these materials at two municipally owned AD facilities: Disco Road (capacity of 75,000 tonnes per year) and Dufferin (expanded in 2021 to 55,000 tonnes). Organics undergo pre-processing, followed by an anaerobic digestion period that produces digestate and biogas [48].

 

The digestate is processed into high-quality compost, while the biogas is upgraded to renewable natural gas (RNG) and injected into the natural gas grid. This RNG fuels municipal vehicles and facilities, helping reduce an estimated 22,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions annually [49, 50]. Compared to aerobic composting, this AD approach enhances processing speed, odour control, contamination tolerance, and greenhouse gas mitigation. The system is further supported by the province’s Waste-Free Ontario Strategy [51]. Nonetheless, challenges persist, including capital costs, specialized operational demands, and limited multi-residential participation. Overall, Toronto’s system exemplifies how technological innovation and policy alignment can drive sustainable urban organics management.

 

Calgary

 

Calgary’s Green Cart program is a central city collection system that turns single-family homes’ organic waste into compost for gardeners and farmers alike. To support the growing demand for organic waste processing and enhance the program’s capacity, a joint federal and municipal investment of $33.7 million was announced in May 2024, allocated by the FCM and ECCC. This funding aims to scale Calgary’s composting facility operations from 100,000 to 160,000 tonnes per year through a public–private partnership model [52, 53].

 

The upgrade includes installing anaerobic digestion modules at the Calgary Composting Facility to convert organic waste into renewable natural gas and high-quality compost [54]. The expected environmental and socio-economic benefits include an estimated annual reduction of 45,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (comparable to removing roughly 14,000 cars from the road), extending landfill lifespan by 20-30 years, and creating approximately 180 construction jobs plus four permanent operational positions [53]. 

 

Despite these advancements, Calgary faces ongoing challenges, such as delays in the Green Cart rollout in new neighbourhoods and persistent cart contamination issues, which result in ongoing costs and safety risks [55]. Nonetheless, Calgary’s integration of scalable infrastructure, financial investment, and environmental policy offers a progressive model for urban organics diversion in Canada.

 

Indigenous Community Innovations in Ontario

 

Indigenous communities in Ontario are demonstrating innovative, community-driven organics management approaches that integrate cultural values with environmental sustainability. The Chippewas of the Thames First Nation near London have established a community composting program centred around a three-tier compost unit located in their community garden. This facility serves the school, health centre, fire hall, and band office, enabling the collective processing of food scraps and garden waste. The program effectively diverts organics from landfill, reduces odours and wildlife attraction, and improves soil fertility through onsite humus production. It is complemented by 14 backyard composters and the planting of 12 fruit trees, fostering community engagement, ecological stewardship, and food sovereignty [56].

 

Meanwhile, the Six Nations of the Grand River are piloting micro anaerobic digestion (AD) systems designed for First Nations rural and reserve communities. This initiative involves Indigenous partners, including the Chippewa of Georgina Island and Walpole Island. The project focuses on renewable biogas production, nutrient-rich digestate for fertilizer, reduced external energy dependence, and building local technical capacity. This pilot supports energy sovereignty and self-determination, offering a scalable, low-carbon waste processing model suited to remote or smaller Indigenous populations [57].

 

Together, these initiatives illustrate how Indigenous-led organics projects advance sustainability, community health, and economic resilience while addressing localized waste management challenges.

 

Smaller Municipalities

 

Innovative organic waste solutions are emerging in smaller British Columbia municipalities, demonstrating creative alternatives to traditional curbside collection programs. In Nelson, a pilot program deployed 1,100 FoodCycler countertop units. FoodCyclers are compact in-home grinders that reduce food waste volume by up to 90%, suppress odours, mitigate wildlife attraction, and improve source separation prior to collection [58]. This initiative is under evaluation for its potential to lower greenhouse gas emissions and its scalability to broader communities. 

 

Across British Columbia, municipalities receive support through provincial climate programs aimed at advancing climate action and waste diversion strategies [59]. These programs promote local government initiatives and encourage community engagement. However, smaller municipalities commonly face challenges such as limited funding and technical capacity constraints. Continued investment and rigorous evaluation remain essential to ensuring the long-term success of these efforts.

 

Synthesis 

 

Drawing from the diverse municipal and Indigenous examples above, several themes highlight both the successes and persistent challenges in Canada’s organics management landscape.

 

Summary of Themes

 

Building on these examples, key themes emerge that define successes and challenges. Successful composting outcomes depend on aligned policy, infrastructure, education, and funding. Urban areas with legislative mandates and advanced facilities achieve high diversion rates, while smaller regions often face access gaps, support shortages, and limited long-term planning. Equitable scaling of composting across Canada requires coordinated, inclusive investment strategies rather than isolated initiatives.

 

Canada’s composting ecosystem is a dynamic mix of advanced technologies, regulatory frameworks, community engagement, and funding mechanisms. Major municipalities lead with innovations like renewable natural gas production, while smaller initiatives demonstrate creativity despite resource constraints. 

 

Persistent Barriers Hindering Program Effectiveness

 

Despite progress, several persistent barriers continue to limit program effectiveness across regions. Fortunately, each challenge presents an opportunity for targeted strategies. Policy reforms can address participation gaps, educational outreach can reduce contamination, and dedicated funding can improve infrastructure deployment.

 

• Contamination from Improper Sorting: Compost quality is degraded by non-organic materials and compostable plastics getting mixed in with organics collections. This also increases operational costs, affecting programs in Halifax, Vancouver, and Toronto.

 

• Low Multi-Unit Residential Participation: Multi-unit residential buildings fall behind single-family homes in organics collection due to space constraints, inconsistent infrastructure, and tenant turnover, limiting urban composting effectiveness. These barriers highlight the need for tailored policies, funding support for infrastructure, and focused education to engage diverse residential communities.

 

• Logistical Constraints in Smaller and Remote Communities: Indigenous and northern communities face challenges including high transportation costs, cold climates, and limited technical support. While community-led innovations exist, scaling remains difficult without sustained investment and oversight.

 

• Infrastructure Gaps and Rollout Delays: Waste diversion targets are hindered by delays in bin distribution and incomplete curbside coverage. Smaller municipalities report inconsistent funding and limited data tracking, which also negatively impact program success.

 

Policy Mandates and Regulatory Alignment

 

Addressing these challenges requires dynamic policy mandates and aligned regulatory frameworks. For example, Metro Vancouver’s organics bylaw provides clear direction and enforcement, which drives higher participation rates and consistent service delivery. Toronto’s alignment with the Waste-Free Ontario Strategy and Halifax’s organics separation bylaws catalyze investments in infrastructure and public engagement. Such policies create a foundation that encourages and prioritizes investments in advanced, scalable organics processing infrastructure. Policies aligned with provincial and federal mandates enable easier funding access and adoption of innovative technologies, enhancing capacity and environmental outcomes.

 

Infrastructure Investment and Technological Innovation

 

Access to advanced and scalable technologies is critical for effective organics management. Urban centers such as Calgary, Halifax, Toronto, and Montreal have invested heavily in anaerobic digestion, enclosed composting, and in-vessel systems that increase processing capacity and reduce emissions. In Ontario, Indigenous communities are leading innovative, community-driven initiatives that integrate cultural values with environmental sustainability. These initiatives include community composting programs and micro anaerobic digestion pilot projects, which emphasize renewable energy production, nutrient recycling, and energy sovereignty tailored to local conditions and needs.

 

Yet, infrastructure alone is not enough. Public education, community engagement, and behavioral guidance remain vital to maximize participation and minimize contamination, ensuring these advanced systems achieve their full potential.

 

Public Education and Behavioural Guidance

 

Technological advances must be complemented by education and community engagement to maximize impact. Engagement programs such as Montreal’s Zero Waste Squad, Vancouver’s education campaigns, and Nelson’s FoodCycler pilot demonstrate that outreach improves participation and reduces contamination. Successful programs combine infrastructure rollout with education, starter kits, and direct citizen support.

 

Integrated funding models support these efforts. Coordinated financial support across federal, provincial, and municipal levels sustains program development and community engagement, making ambitious organics management possible.

 

Integrated Funding Models

 

Coordinated funding streams, including federal grants like the Green Municipal Fund, provincial programs, and municipal budgets, enhance local capacity. Notable examples include Calgary’s public-private partnerships scaling anaerobic digestion infrastructure and Montreal’s investment in its LEED-certified composting facility. Additionally, targeted support for Indigenous-led initiatives in Ontario, such as community composting and micro anaerobic digestion pilots, demonstrates how tailored investments advance sustainable organics management.

 

Scaling Challenges: Operational and Community-Based Considerations

 

While specific funding supports growth, scaling reveals ongoing operational and community challenges. Infrastructure capacity is a key constraint. For instance, Metro Vancouver’s composting facilities have neared capacity, generating public complaints about persistent odours in nearby communities like Delta, B.C. [60]. Such odours highlight the necessity for facility siting improvements, odour management technologies, and meaningful community consultation. These operational challenges underscore the necessity of ongoing innovation and community consultation, echoing themes throughout this paper.

 

Additionally, many municipal organic waste fleets rely on diesel or gasoline-powered trucks, raising concerns about the net climate benefits of these programs. Although diverting organic waste reduces methane, emissions from transportation and facility operations must be minimized to maximize environmental gains. Integrating low-emission technologies, such as electric collection fleets, is essential. The environmental benefits of organics diversion must be balanced against emissions from waste collection fleets. This highlights the importance of thinking through low-emission technologies, such as electric vehicles, into the broader organics management system as a critical link to sustainable infrastructure development.

 

The increase in composting also poses operational risks if facilities reach capacity sooner than planned, or if the regions do not have consistent end-product compost distribution. While at the same time, poorly managed curbside composting can attract wildlife, especially in suburban or rural-adjacent areas. Education campaigns with clear guidance on compost handling, collection schedules, and acceptable materials are critical to mitigating these issues and building public trust.

 

Ecological and Social Value

 

Composting reduces methane emissions by keeping organic waste out of landfills, directly supporting climate action goals. When applied to land, compost improves soil health, boosts water retention, and strengthens carbon sequestration, which enhances both food systems and ecological resilience. Socially, composting generates green jobs in collection, processing, and education. It also builds public awareness and fosters shared responsibility, encouraging sustainable habits. These outcomes drive lasting environmental stewardship and reinforce composting’s role in a circular, community-rooted economy.

 

Toward a Circular Economy Perspective

 

These environmental and social benefits highlight the need for a circular economy approach. To address the complexities of scaling composting, Canada must move beyond operational fixes and adopt a circular economy mindset. Circular economy is a regenerative model that eliminates waste by designing systems for reuse, recycling, and renewal [8]. Composting, in this context, becomes more than waste diversion. It actively returns nutrients to the soil, supports carbon sequestration, and rebuilds ecological systems.

 

Municipalities can apply this model by creating composting facilities near landfill operations to pair methane capture with aerobic processing, or by creating decentralized compost hubs in dense urban neighborhoods to reduce transport emissions and improve accessibility. These innovations must pair with clear regulations and quality control to ensure environmental and public health outcomes.

 

Discussion on Scaling Composting in Canada

 

Integrating circular economy principles sets the stage for final reflections and future directions. As Canadian municipalities implement composting to reduce landfill waste and greenhouse gas emissions, the emphasis must shift from isolated pilots toward addressing the complex realities of equitable, effective scaling. While many programs show promise, full-scale implementation presents logistical, environmental, and social challenges requiring comprehensive, systems-level solutions.

 

A key insight from Canada’s diverse initiatives is the necessity of ongoing learning and adaptation. Successful programs reject one-size-fits-all models by sharing experiences, tailoring approaches to local contexts, and refining policies and technologies over time. Established municipalities are an example to smaller communities, providing practical lessons in contamination control, public engagement, and technology integration, while Indigenous-led projects contribute needed perspectives by embedding cultural values and community priorities into sustainable waste management.

 

This diversity creates a collaborative environment, bridging gaps between urban and rural, large and small-scale efforts. Knowledge sharing is crucial to overcoming persistent barriers, such as low participation in multi-unit residences or logistical challenges in remote communities, through tailored solutions instead of only uniform policies.

 

Ultimately, framing composting as an adaptive, systems-based network encourages flexible policies, diversified funding, and ongoing public education, all strengthened by cross-sector collaboration. This approach aligns with circular economy principles that emphasize regeneration, reuse, and systemic redesign, reinforcing composting not just as waste management, but as integral to environmental stewardship.

 

Conclusion

 

Canada’s growing composting landscape demonstrates a national willingness to collaborate, innovate, and adapt. Municipalities and Indigenous communities are not only building infrastructure but also reshaping public behaviour and local economies through composting. To meet climate and waste diversion goals, Canada must accelerate these efforts while ensuring programs remain equitable, context-sensitive, and locally driven.

 

Moving forward, success will hinge on balancing momentum with thoughtful planning, innovation with clear regulation, and ambition with inclusivity. By fostering shared learning and integrating diverse perspectives, Canada can create composting systems that not only manage waste but actively regenerate ecosystems and strengthen communities. Composting, when embraced as part of a circular economy, offers more than a technical fix, it becomes a catalyst for a more resilient and sustainable future.

 

References

[1] EPA, “Composting at home,” US EPA, Oct. 16, 2018. https://www.epa.gov/recycle/composting-home

[2] EPA, “Understanding Global Warming Potentials,” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Apr. 18, 2023. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials

[3] Global Methane Tracker 2025 – Analysis - IEA, “Global Methane Tracker 2025 – Analysis - IEA,” IEA, May 07, 2025. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-methane-tracker-2025

[4] “Faster and Further: Canada’s Methane Strategy,” publications.gc.ca, 2022. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2022/eccc/En4-491-2022-eng.pdf

[5] “Greenhouse Gas Calculator for Organic Waste Management: Methodology Report,” publications.gc.ca, 2022. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2022/eccc/En14-493-1-2022-eng.pdf

[6] “Reducing methane emissions from Canada’s municipal solid waste landfills: Discussion paper,” www.canada.ca, Jan. 28, 2022. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/canadian-environmental-protection-act-registry/reducing-methane-emissions-canada-municipal-solid-waste-landfills-discussion.html

[7] “Net-Zero Emissions by 2050,” Government of Canada, Sep. 03, 2024. https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment/weather/climatechange/climate-plan/net-zero-emissions-2050.html

[8] “Food and the circular economy,” www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org, Sep. 16, 2019. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/food-and-the-circular-economy-deep-dive

[9] “Municipal solid waste: a shared responsibility - Canada.ca,” Canada.ca, 2018. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/managing-reducing-waste/municipal-solid/shared-responsibility.html

[10] “Municipal Solid Waste Organics Processing,” 2013. Available: https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/eccc/migration/main/gdd-mw/3e8cf6c7-f214-4ba2-a1a3-163978ee9d6e/13-047-id-458-pdf_accessible_ang_r2-reduced-20size.pdf

[11] “Greenhouse gas calculator for organic waste management - Canada.ca,” Canada.ca, 2022. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/managing-reducing-waste/municipal-solid/waste-greenhouse-gases-canada-actions/calculator.html

[12] “Solid Waste Management for Northern and Remote Communities: Planning and Technical Guidance Document,” publications.gc.ca, Mar. 2017. https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2017/eccc/En14-263-2016-eng.pdf

[13] “Waste - CleanBC,” Waste- Clean BC. https://cleanbc.gov.bc.ca/about-climate-change/drivers/waste/

[14] “Residential organic waste and local governments - Province of British Columbia,” www2.gov.bc.ca, Feb. 21, 2025. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/environment/waste-management/food-and-organic-waste/organic-waste-diversion/residential-organic-waste-diversion

[15] “Composting facilities | Alberta.ca,” www.alberta.ca, 2024. https://www.alberta.ca/composting-facilities

[16] “RMA’s Legislative Update: Week of May 5 – 9, 2025 – RMA,” Rmalberta.com, May 2025. https://rmalberta.com/news/rmas-legislative-update-week-of-may-5-9-2025/

[17] S. Tanigawa, “Fact Sheet - Biogas: Converting Waste to Energy,” Environmental and Energy Study Institute, Oct. 03, 2017. https://www.eesi.org/papers/view/fact-sheet-biogasconverting-waste-to-energy

[18] “Compost Facilities | Solid Waste Management Facilities | Government of Saskatchewan,” Government of Saskatchewan. https://www.saskatchewan.ca/residents/environment-public-health-and-safety/solid-waste-management-facilities/compost-facilities

[19] “Waste Diversion Program,” Saskatchewan.ca, 2024. https://taskroom.saskatchewan.ca/services-and-support/waste-diversion-program

[20] A. Name, “WasteWise | Province of Manitoba,” Gov.mb.ca, 2020. https://www.gov.mb.ca/sd/wastewise/compost/program.html

[21] “Province of Manitoba | Environment and Climate Change,” Gov.mb.ca. https://www.gov.mb.ca/sd/wastewise/wastereduction/act.html

[22] “Food and Organic Waste Framework,” Ontario.ca, 2019. https://www.ontario.ca/page/food-and-organic-waste-framework

[23] “Quebec Residual Materials Management Policy,” Gouv.qc.ca. https://www.environnement.gouv.qc.ca/matieres/pgmr/index_en.htm

[24] “A Roadmap for Transforming our Waste into Materials for Tomorrow ,” Government of New Brunswick. Available: https://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Corporate/Promo/waste-dechets/reports-rapports/solid-waste-management-report-e.pdf

[25] “Residential Backyard and Curbside Composting | Recycling and Waste,” novascotia.ca. https://novascotia.ca/nse/waste/rescomposting.asp

[26] “Waste Watch,” www.princeedwardisland.ca, Nov. 04, 2016. https://www.princeedwardisland.ca/en/information/waste-watch

[27] “SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT,” Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, 2017. Available: https://www.gov.nl.ca/ecc/files/waste-management-pdf-wm-performance-monitoring-report-may-2017.pdf

[28] “Canada’s Partnership with Indigenous Peoples on Climate,” www.canada.ca, 2025. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/indigenous-partnership.html

[29] “Indigenous Leadership Fund,” www.canada.ca, 2024. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/climate-change/low-carbon-economy-fund/indigenous-leadership.html

[30] “About FCM | Federation of Canadian Municipalities,” fcm.ca, 2025. https://fcm.ca/en/about-fcm

[31] “Home - The Compost Council of Canada,” The Compost Council of Canada. https://www.compost.org/

[32] “National Solid Waste Benchmarking Initiative,” Nationalbenchmarking.ca, 2025. https://nswbi.nationalbenchmarking.ca/ (accessed Jul. 15, 2025).

[33] “NCL 6th Edition Launch - The Climate Reality Project Canada,” Climatereality.ca, 2025. https://www.climatereality.ca/ncl-6th-edition-launch

[34] G. Taylor, “Major Cities Lead Smaller Municipalities in Climate Policy, Active Transportation,” The Energy Mix, Oct. 16, 2024. https://www.theenergymix.com/major-cities-lead-smaller-municipalities-in-climate-policy-active-transportation/

[35] J. Kassirer, “Tools of Change,” toolsofchange.com. https://toolsofchange.com/en/case-studies/detail/133/

[36] “Halifax Well-being – Health, Safety, and Environment – Halifax Index…,” Halifax Partnership, 2025. https://halifaxpartnership.com/research-strategy/halifax-index/wellbeing/#quality-of-life_aspects-of-life

[37] “New Organics Facility,” www.halifax.ca, Sep. 2024. https://www.halifax.ca/home-property/garbage-recycling-green-cart/green-carts-leaf-yard-material/new-organics-facility

[38] “Treatment centre for organic waste: locally produced compost,” Montreal, 2024. https://montreal.ca/en/articles/treatment-centre-organic-waste-locally-produced-compost-79059

[39] B. Shingler, “Finally, Montreal has its own composting plant,” CBC, Oct. 22, 2024. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/montreal-composting-saint-laurent-1.7358210

[40] Sarah-Maria Khoueiry, “Montreal opens its first-ever indoor centre to process organic waste,” CityNews Montreal, Oct. 21, 2024. https://montreal.citynews.ca/2024/10/21/first-indoors-center-organic-waste/

[41] E. Seize, “Montreal’s Zero Waste Squad wants entire city to compost,” CityNews Montreal, Oct. 26, 2024. https://montreal.citynews.ca/2024/10/26/montreal-zero-waste-squad-compost/

[42] “About Food Scraps Recycling ,” metrovancouver.org. https://metrovancouver.org/services/solid-waste/about-food-scraps-recycling

[43] S. Labbé, “New company takes over Metro Vancouver incinerator amid expansion plans and opposition,” Business in Vancouver, Mar. 10, 2025. https://www.biv.com/news/economy-law-politics/new-company-takes-over-metro-vancouver-incinerator-amid-expansion-plans-and-opposition-10350987

[44] “CleanBC Organics Infrastructure and Collection Program - Province of British Columbia,” www2.gov.bc.ca, Mar. 06, 2025. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/environment/waste-management/food-and-organic-waste/organic-waste-diversion/cleanbc-organic-infrastructure-and-collection-program

[45] “Organic matter recycling regulation and guidance ,” www2.gov.bc.ca, Jun. 30, 2023. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/environment/waste-management/food-and-organic-waste/regulations-guidelines

[46] “Solid Waste Management Plan ,” Metrovancouver.org, 2024. https://metrovancouver.org/services/solid-waste/solid-waste-management-plan

[47] “Green bin – composting food scraps and yard waste,” vancouver.ca. https://vancouver.ca/home-property-development/green-bin-composting-food-scraps-and-yard-waste.aspx

[48] “Solid Waste Management Facilities,” City of Toronto. https://www.toronto.ca/services-payments/recycling-organics-garbage/solid-waste-facilities/

[49] “Turning Waste into Renewable Natural Gas,” City of Toronto. https://www.toronto.ca/services-payments/recycling-organics-garbage/solid-waste-facilities/renewable-natural-gas/

[50] “Veolia Awarded Operations and Maintenance Contract for the City of Toronto’s Dufferin Anaerobic Digestion Facility,” Veolia Canada. https://www.veolia.ca/en/media/press-releases/veolia-awarded-operations-and-maintenance-contract-city-torontos-dufferin

[51] “Strategy for a Waste-Free Ontario: Building the Circular Economy,” Ontario.ca, Feb. 2023. https://www.ontario.ca/page/strategy-waste-free-ontario-building-circular-economy

[52] “Green Cart Food and Yard Waste program,” https://www.calgary.ca. https://www.calgary.ca/waste/residential/green-cart.html

[53] “News: Canada and FCM’s Green Municipal Fund Invest $33.7 Million to Expand Composting Services in Calgary,” Fcm.ca, May 27, 2024. https://fcm.ca/en/news-media/news-release/gmf/canada-fcm-green-municipal-fund-invest-33-million-expand-composting-services-calgary

[54] “Calgary Composting Facility breaks ground: celebrating new construction and funders,” Calgary Composting Facility breaks ground: celebrating new construction and funders , May 27, 2024. https://newsroom.calgary.ca/calgary-composting-facility-breaks-ground-celebrating-new-construction-and-funders/

[55] “Contamination in the carts,” https://www.calgary.ca. https://www.calgary.ca/waste/residential/cart-contamination.html

[56] Green Economy London, “Chippewas of the Thames First Nation: Community Composting Support Project,” London Environmental Network. https://www.londonenvironment.net/chippewas_of_the_thames_first_nation_community_composting_support_project

[57] “Cambium Indigenous Professional Services,” CIPS. https://www.indigenousaware.com/projects/micro-anaerobic-digestion-first-nations

[58] “Government of Canada and FCM invest in state-of-the-art waste diversion program in Nelson, BC,” Fcm.ca, Jun. 19, 2023. https://fcm.ca/en/news-media/news-release/gmf/government-canada-and-fcm-invest-in-state-the-art-waste-diversion-program-in-nelson-bc (accessed Jul. 15, 2025).

[59] “Local government climate action highlights,” Gov.bc.ca, 2025. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/environment/climate-change/local-governments/local-government-climate-action-highlights

[60] M. Zeidler, “Delta joins Metro Vancouver cities grappling with compost stench,” CBC, Feb. 05, 2018. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/delta-joins-metro-vancouver-cities-grappling-with-compost-stench-1.4517980