How Regulations in Canadian Mining Affect Costs Compared to China
By Denis Koshelev
When it comes to mineral mining, not all countries play by the same rules — or pay the same price. Canada and China, two competitors in the global mining sector, present a striking contrast in how government oversight and environmental initiatives influence the cost of extracting minerals from the ground.
In Canada, a rigorous regulatory framework and ambitious green policies mean that mining projects face potentially higher upfront and long-term costs, but also greater scrutiny and community engagement. Meanwhile, China’s rapid expansion and state-backed investment have kept costs lower, with less stringent enforcement of environmental standards and a focus on speed and scale.
Let’s see how these differing approaches impact the bottom line for mining companies, and what that means for the future of mineral extraction in both countries.
Cost Implications of Stricter Environmental Regulations in Canada
The stringent environmental regulations in Canada impose significant direct and indirect costs on mining operations. Direct costs include expenditures for environmental impact assessments (EIAs), which can be lengthy and expensive, often involving years of study and consultation. Obtaining numerous permits for water use, waste management (especially sophisticated tailings storage facilities), air quality, and biodiversity protection adds substantial upfront and ongoing expenses.
Modern tailings management, as mandated in British Columbia following the Mount Polley incident, is a significant capital and operational expenditure. (A tailings dam failure at the Mount Polley Mine occurred on August 4, 2014. This resulted in the loss of about 17 million cubic meters of water and 8 million cubic meters of tailings/materials into Polley Lake, Hazeltine Creek and Quesnel Lake with significant impact.)
The contents of a tailings pond are pictured flowing down the Hazeltine Creek intoQuesnel Lake near the town of Likely, B.C., on August 5, 2014. (Jonathan Hayward/Canadian Press)
Mine closure and reclamation obligations represent another very significant direct cost, with companies required to post substantial financial security to cover estimated cleanup costs. The proposed Coal Mining Effluent Regulations will likely necessitate investments in upgraded water treatment.
Data shows that Canada’s regulatory approval processes have negatively impacted investment by creating uncertainty and lengthening project timelines. Canada’s share of global mining investment has declined significantly in recent years, partly due to these regulatory complexities and delays. [31]
Indirect costs are also substantial. These include costs from delays in project approval due to complex regulatory processes and legal challenges, affecting project economics by extending time to revenue and increasing financing costs. Investment in R&D or new, cleaner technologies to meet standards is an indirect cost that may lead to long-term efficiencies [14].
The risk of non-compliance, leading to fines, operational disruptions, and reputational damage, is another indirect cost. The Canadian Climate Institute report highlights that abandoned mines and underfunded reclamation liabilities persist, indicating potential long-term costs that are not fully captured. The Yellow Giant Mine case, where British Columbia faced a $0.6 to $1.2 million shortfall in reclamation costs due to inadequate security, illustrates how these costs can fall on the public purse [15].
Environmental Cost Structures in Chinese Mining
Domestically, China has been progressively tightening its environmental regulations. The revised Mineral Resources Law (effective July 2025) mandates ecological restoration plans before mining begins and holds companies accountable, with fines for non-compliance potentially up to twice the cost of restoration [9]. Companies must establish restoration funds and can face severe penalties, including operational suspension or closure, for environmental violations [5]. The government’s push for “green mining” standards aims for most large and medium-sized mines to be compliant by 2028, necessitating investments in environmental protection [16]. A 2020 game-theoretical analysis indicated that the additional cost of environmentally friendly disposal, such as seepage-prevention layers or alkaline additions to tailings, was considered “sufficiently cheap” in China, potentially 10 to 20 CNY/tonne. The cost of reclaiming abandoned land was cited as 25 CNY per square meter if no new facilities were needed [17]. However, the same study noted that the high marginal cost for overall environmental protection contributes to the slow adoption of green mining, with less than 2% of mines being pilot green mines by 2019.
The picture changes significantly for Chinese overseas mining investments, particularly under the BRI and in regions with weak governance. While China has issued guidelines like the 2022 “Guidelines for ecological and environmental protection of foreign investment cooperation construction projects,” these are often non-binding and lack strong enforcement mechanisms [8].
Consequently, Chinese companies operating overseas may not face the same regulatory pressure or incur the same environmental compliance costs as they do domestically or as Western companies under stricter ESG standards. This can lead to a lower direct cost structure for minerals sourced from these overseas operations, as expenses for comprehensive environmental management might be minimized. The emphasis on respecting host country sovereignty can mean that if local environmental laws are lax, Chinese companies may not adopt higher, more costly standards. This disparity in environmental cost internalization can create a competitive advantage. The relaxation of environmental rules in Tibet to promote mining also suggests lower immediate compliance costs in some domestic contexts.
Environmental Cost Structures in Canadian Mining
In Canada, mineral exploration spending is projected to be around CAD 4.2 billion in 2025 [22]. However, capital expenditures for mining operations in the metal mining subsector are expected to decline to approximately CAD 9.8 billion in 2025 from 2024 levels of around CAD 10.3 billion. Canadian mining costs are elevated, particularly in northern and remote regions, due to the lack of infrastructure, such as railways, highways, and power grids, which increases the cost of transportation and logistics by 2 to 2.5 times compared to southern regions [23]. This infrastructure deficit means that only the highest quality deposits often justify the investment. Capital costs specific to projects illustrate further differences: for example, open-pit mining development projects in Canada include complex cost elements like pre-stripping, infrastructure development, mobile fleets, and tailings management, with capital costs subject to stringent engineering estimates and potentially high contingency margins reflecting project uncertainties in Canada’s regulatory and environmental contexts.
China’s infrastructure supports extensive underground and surface mining activities at a large scale, which likely reduces unit costs compared to Canada’s remote sites. China has also invested heavily in “green mining” and intelligent mine technologies, with 71 demonstration projects and a green mining equipment market valued in the hundreds of billions of Yuan.
Direct cost comparisons between Canadian and Chinese mining operations are complex but generally indicate that stricter environmental regulations in Canada contribute to higher operating costs. A specific example for nickel mining illustrates this: at Raglan, Canada’s biggest nickel mine, the total cash cost was $416.47 per ton, while the Sorowako mine in Indonesia — a jurisdiction with different regulations but operated by Chinese companies — had a total cash cost of $243.30 per ton [18].
This $173.17 per ton difference highlights a potential cost disadvantage for Canadian producers, partly attributable to more rigorous environmental compliance requirements. Farmonaut 2025 data estimates Canada’s production cost per unit (for major operators) at USD 41.50 with a high sustainability score of 9/10, while the global industry average is USD 47.10 (sustainability 7/10) and emerging markets like Africa are at USD 50.30 (sustainability 6/10) [19]. This Farmonaut data suggests that, despite the high costs associated with stringent regulations, Canada’s most efficient operators can achieve a lower production cost per unit than the global average. This indicates that factors such as high-quality deposits and technological advantages can offset the financial burden of environmental compliance, demonstrating that high sustainability and cost-effectiveness are not mutually exclusive. The Canadian Mining Journal (2023) also noted that rising capital and operating costs are influenced by ESG factors [20].
The European Council on Foreign Relations notes that metals mined in the EU are often processed in China, partly due to lower prices and the offshoring of environmental risks [21].
Recent Developments and Future Outlook (Post-2020)
In Canada, recent policy shifts since 2020 have reflected an increasing focus on critical minerals, national security in resource sectors, and efforts to streamline regulatory processes, all while maintaining high environmental standards. The federal government introduced a Critical Minerals Strategy aimed at developing a domestic supply chain for minerals essential for clean technology and strategic industries, reducing reliance on adversarial nations like China. This strategy is backed by funding commitments, such as $4 billion over eight years, though this is perceived by some as insufficient compared to investments by competitor nations [25]. A significant policy development is the strengthening of the Investment Canada Act (ICA), enhancing the government’s ability to review and block foreign investments, particularly from state-owned enterprises or entities deemed to pose a risk to national security, especially in the critical minerals sector. This has led to orders for Chinese firms to divest from Canadian mining investments [26].
Market trends indicate that despite these policy efforts, Canadian mining companies, particularly SMEs, continue to face challenges in attracting sufficient investment, leading some to seek financing from Chinese entities.
The high costs associated with exploration, development, and operation in Canada contribute to this capital crunch. These costs are partly due to stringent environmental regulations and permitting timelines, although Canada’s average of two years is better than the U.S. seven-to-ten-year process. [27] There is an ongoing push from industry for further regulatory streamlining. The 2023 Supreme Court ruling on the Impact Assessment Act and the subsequent 2024 amendments are also key post-2020 developments, aiming to refine the federal environmental assessment process. The Canadian mining sector remains a vital exporter, with resource-based sectors, like mining and quarrying, becoming Canada’s largest export category to China by 2023, indicating continued strong demand for Canadian minerals, particularly mineral fuels and copper [28].
Final Thoughts
While it has historically been true that less stringent environmental and safety regulations in China contributed to lower costs for mining precious metals (particularly rare earth elements), recent years have seen increased efforts by Chinese authorities to strengthen oversight, clean up illegal mining, and impose tougher regulations on the industry. Nonetheless, lax enforcement, corruption, and illegal operations have persisted alongside official reforms, allowing many mines to continue operating with lower environmental and labour costs compared to countries with stricter regulation and enforcement, such as Canada, the United States, or Australia.
This combination of regulatory leniency, government subsidies, and low labour costs allowed Chinese producers to outcompete rivals globally for many years, helping China secure dominance in the rare earth and precious metals market. However, these cost advantages have come at significant environmental and health costs, especially in key mining regions such as Inner Mongolia, where severe pollution and public health consequences have been documented [5][4].
Canada applies rigorous regulatory frameworks for the approval and oversight of mining projects. This includes conducting extensive impact assessments, obtaining environmental permits, and holding mandatory consultations with local and Indigenous communities. The process can add years and significant consulting costs to project development, though some recent reforms are aimed at expediting timelines. Both China and Canada have recently promoted green mining policies and introduced guidelines to improve environmental practices. But enforcement of these standards is widely considered weaker in China than in Canada, and Chinese government oversight is less transparent or stringent in many regions. [8]
Recently, China has enacted new regulations and implemented tougher oversight, including quotas, environmental tracking, and periodic crackdowns on illegal mining, but illegal activity and local circumvention of rules persist. These enforcement gaps mean that, on average, mining precious metals in China can still be cheaper than in countries with robustly enforced environmental standards, though the gap is narrowing as China reacts to international pressure and its own severe environmental impacts [3][6][2][1].
References
1. International Comparative Legal Guides. (2025, September 16). Mining laws and regulations: Canada 2026. ICLG.com. https://iclg.com/practice-areas/mining-laws-and-regulations/canada
2. Jebson, B., Pickersgill, M., Fortier, M. J., Marshall, S., & Patenaude, E. (2023, December 17). Guide to mining regulatory and legal regimes in Canada. Torys LLP. https://www.torys.com/our-latest-thinking/publications/2023/12/guide-to-mining-regulatory-and-legal-regimes-in-canada
3. Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2025, July 11). Proposed Coal Mining Effluent Regulations. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/managing-pollution/sources-industry/mining-effluent/proposed-coal-mining-effluent-regulations.html
4. Pollon, C., & Al-Aini, E. (2025). Managing environmental risks of mining critical minerals in Canada. Canadian Climate Institute. https://climateinstitute.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Critical-minerals-environmental-risk.pdf
5. International Comparative Legal Guides. (n.d.). Mining laws and regulations: China 2025. ICLG.com. https://web.archive.org/web/20250803025248/https://iclg.com/practice-areas/mining-laws-and-regulations/china
6. Els, F. (2024, February 20). CHART: China’s Belt and Road mining investment hits record. MINING.com. https://www.mining.com/chart-chinas-belt-and-road-mining-investment-hits-record/
7. National Development and Reform Commission. (2017). National mineral resources plan (2016-2020). https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fggz/fzzlgh/gjjzxgh/201705/t20170511_1196755.html
8. Global Witness. (2025, July 1). Can China fix the problems with transition mineral mining abroad? Global Witness. https://globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/transition-minerals/can-china-fix-the-problems-with-transition-mineral-mining-abroad/
9. Lai, Y., & Chen, Y. (2024, April 25). China’s draft mining law mandates ecological restoration for first time, but gaps remain. Dialogue Earth. https://dialogue.earth/en/pollution/china-draft-mining-law-ecological-restoration/
10. International Energy Agency. (2025, September 1). Law 20.920. IEA Policies Database. https://www.iea.org/policies/25204-law-20920
11. Walk the Street Capital. (2025, May 25). China’s new environmental regulations set to boost rare earth prices. Walk the Street Capital. https://web.archive.org/web/20250616130103/https://www.walkthestreetcapital.com/articles/chinas-new-environmental-regulations-set-to-boost-rare-earth-prices-8bec8
12. Walk the Street Capital. (2025, May 25). China’s new environmental regulations set to boost rare earth prices. Walk the Street Capital. https://web.archive.org/web/20250616130103/https://www.walkthestreetcapital.com/articles/chinas-new-environmental-regulations-set-to-boost-rare-earth-prices-8bec8
13. Pathak, S. (2025, April 22). China’s rapacity for mining in Tibet: An Indian perspective (Issue brief). Institute for Security & Development Policy. https://www.isdp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Brief-Sriparna-Apr-22-2025.pdf
14. Bouchard, J. (2024, March 26). Canadian miners need capital — but only China is stepping up. Center for North American Prosperity and Security. https://cnaps.org/canadian-miners-need-capital-but-only-china-is-stepping-up-joseph-bouchard-in-the-diplomat/
15. The Narwhal. (2024, February 21). British Columbia’s multimillion-dollar mining problem. The Narwhal. https://thenarwhal.ca/bc-mining-liabilities-cleanup-costs-taxpayers/
16. Li, M. (2024, April 17). China expands green mine construction scope. China Daily. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202404/17/WS661f99f3a31082fc043c282b.html
17. Zhao, Y., Zhao, G., Zhou, J., Pei, D., Liang, W., & Qiu, J. (2020). What hinders the promotion of the green mining mode in China? A game-theoretical analysis of local government and metal mining companies. Sustainability, 12(7), 2991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072991
18. Baskaran, G. (2025, January 29). Canadian tariffs will undermine U.S. minerals security. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/canadian-tariffs-will-undermine-us-minerals-security
19. Farmonaut. (2025). Mining cost curve analytics: 2025 data insights. Farmonaut. https://farmonaut.com/mining/mining-cost-curve-analytics-2025-data-insights
20. Terhune, B. (2023, February 14). COSTMINE: Yes, costs have risen. Canadian Mining Journal. https://www.canadianminingjournal.com/featured-article/costmine-yes-costs-have-risen/
21. Logan, S. (2024, November 7). Material world: How Europe can compete with China in the race for Africa’s critical minerals. European Council on Foreign Relations. https://ecfr.eu/publication/material-world-how-europe-can-compete-with-china-in-the-race-for-africas-critical-minerals/
22. Natural Resources Canada. (2025, June 25). Minerals and the economy. Government of Canada. https://natural-resources.canada.ca/minerals-mining/mining-data-statistics-analysis/minerals-economy
23. Mining Association of Canada. (2024). The mining story 2024: Canadian mining industry facts and figures. Author. https://mining.ca/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2024/06/Facts-and-Figures-2023-FINAL-DIGITAL.pdf
24. Trade Commissioner Service. (2023, October 30). Mining market in China. Government of Canada. https://www.tradecommissioner.gc.ca/en/market-industry-info/search-country-region/country/canada-china-export/mining-market.html
25. MINING.com. (2024, October 10). Teck CEO says Canada must spend more to erode China’s critical minerals dominance. MINING.com. https://www.mining.com/web/teck-ceo-urges-west-to-invest-more-in-critical-minerals-to-counter-chinas-heft/
26. Reuters. (2022, November 3). Canada orders three Chinese firms to exit lithium mining. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/canada-orders-three-foreign-firms-divest-investments-critical-minerals-2022-11-02/
27. Nadjibulla, V., & Liu, X. M. (2025, March 19). How escalating U.S.-China competition over critical minerals impacts Canada. Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. https://www.asiapacific.ca/publication/how-escalating-us-china-competition-over-critical-minerals
28. China Briefing. (2024, September 20). China’-Canada relations: Boosting economic dynamics amid challenges. China Briefing. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/china-canada-relations-boosting-economic-dynamics-amid-challenges/
29. GAN Integrity. (2020, September 30). China risk report. GAN Integrity. https://www.ganintegrity.com/country-profiles/china
30. Collard, R., Dempsey, J., Al Bouchi, Y., & Bawaan, N. (2024). Does regulation delay mines? A timeline and economic benefit audit of British Columbia mines. FACETS. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2024-0083
31. Hunter, D., Roth, B., & Su, M. (2025, April 23). Unlocking Canada’s mining potential. Canadian Mining Journal. https://www.canadianminingjournal.com/featured-article/unlocking-canadas-mining-potential/
